Post by BrittanyMurphyRIP on Sept 23, 2011 16:10:05 GMT -8
Julia's allegations seem a little "out there" and I'm skeptical
I applaud skepticism, but how so? No space aliens or illuminati here - just people abusing their position to pursue a personal vendetta. It's just like a cop harassing a personal enemy by pulling him over all the time, except these cops can call out helicopters. If they're not held to account (which the current political climate discourages), what's to stop them? Inevitably they become arrogant.
But they are credible enough to deserve thorough investigation by competent journalists
The main evidence as I see it is available to all of us in the form of letters and citations of legal judgements whose veracity is hitherto unchallenged. Julia would obviously be opening herself to legal action by fabrication, with as yet no possible reward.
I will read this book if it is published, as I will also read anything from Sharon or the "other side."
I too have long awaited Sharon's account, but fear it will never come.
I have lots of questions about Brittany's life, the decline of her career, and the circumstances of her death that I doubt will ever be answered.
They certainly won't if you don't ask them
I prefer to reflect on her remarkable work.
I think we all would in the ideal world, but you can't separate the work from the life and death.
I have one big question which I would like to have answered: Why was the media coverage following her death so relentlessly negative, compared to that of other deceased stars such as Michael Jackson?
Could you be more specific? Both had some negative press in their lifetimes - Jackson was obviously far more controversial, with Brittany it was really just gossip sites labelling her crazy and some blind items which may not have referred to her, or been total fabrications. I wouldn't say either got negative press after their deaths